Can Mom Leave a Home to a Child but Not Grandchildren?

You have many options on how to leave a home to your child, but not a grandchild, including a will, trust and an enhanced life estate deed.

There are numerous ways to pass your property at death. A woman with three grown daughters faced a problem about passing down the family home. She wanted to leave a home to a child who has taken care of and is closest to her. However, she also wanted to be sure that, if something happened to this youngest daughter, the house would go to her two other daughters and not the close daughter’s adult children.

With proper planning, this can be done, as described in the article “Mom needs contingency plan to pass house title” from mySanAntonio.

One way is to rely on a last will and testament. The will would state that she leaves the house to the youngest daughter, under terms of a testamentary trust inside the will. The executor would probate the will and the trust would be established at death.  The trust terms would permit the daughter to use, enjoy, and live in the house during her lifetime, as the beneficiary of the testamentary trust.

The two older daughters would be named as the secondary beneficiaries of the trust. When the younger daughter dies, the trust distributes the house to the older daughters.  The trust would also provide what would happen to the property if the older daughters are deceased.

The plan will need to be prepared by a qualified estate planning attorney. This is not a terrible process, if the will is professionally written and properly executed, includes an executor and a trustee and clear instructions about her wishes.

However, there are other options, which can also be used in conjunction.  One is an enhanced life estate deed and another is a living trust. The enhanced life estate deed specifies that the woman is retaining a life estate, that is, the right to use, enjoy and occupy her home, for the rest of her life. The document specifies that when she dies, the home goes to her youngest daughter. The owner would also want to specify that she has the right to change her mind at any time.

This approach avoids probate. However, there is a downside. If the youngest daughter dies before the mother, then the mother will need to take legal action to cancel the deed and issue a new one to the two older daughters. If the daughter outlives her mother, once she inherits the house, there will be no way to have it transferred to the other sisters in the future (unless the daughter choses to do so) and presumably the property will go to the grandchildren after all.  Clients who try to construct their own estate plans often fall into this trap, they try to rely on beneficiary designations for everything and can’t address contingencies.

A living trust provides the detailed control allowed in a will, but the trust, which must be properly created and funded, avoids going to probate. The trust would let the mother live in the home, and when she dies, the title to the house stays in trust with her youngest daughter, who is able to live in the house. However, she never becomes the owner of the house. The trust would continue to own the house. The trust would specify that when the daughter dies, the house goes to the two older daughters. She may also use the enhanced life estate deed, and have it name the trust as beneficiary at her death to ensure it goes to the right beneficiaries.

There are other considerations which affect these decisions, such as taxes, who to put in charge of the process and long term care planning.  See here for more information.  https://galligan-law.com/removing-your-house-from-your-trust/

If you have a similar situation and want to learn more, call our office today.  We will walk you through these issues and help craft a plan that accomplishes your goals.

Reference: mySanAntonio (June 8, 2020) “Mom needs contingency plan to pass house title”

Continue ReadingCan Mom Leave a Home to a Child but Not Grandchildren?

Estate Planning for Our Pets

A complete estate plan should address what happens to your pets when you are unable to care for them.
A complete estate plan should address what happens to your pets when you are unable to care for them.

Many people laugh when they hear about estate planning for pets. They think of outrageous stories of a dog or cat being left millions in a trust. But have you ever considered what would happen to your pets if you were not around to take care of them?

It’s easy to assume that someone will step in to care for your pets after you pass away, but the reality is, unless you have made arrangements ahead of time, your pet could be released onto the streets, dropped off at the shelter, neglected, or euthanized. In the best of circumstances, your pets might not get the special care they need if you have not left behind instructions regarding their special food, medications, and other details that would help someone care for your pet the way you would have.

The simplest way to make sure your pet will be cared for after you’re gone is to talk to one or two people to get their commitment to either take your pet into their home or find a good home for your pet. You can then include a short paragraph in your Will or living trust stating who should get custody of your pet. You can even leave the person who agrees to take your pet a small sum of money as a token of your appreciation.

If you are unable to find a person to agree to take your pet, there are organizations dedicated to the care of pets in exchange for a monetary gift to the institution. These organizations usually require that you make arrangements for the pet’s care during your lifetime. Your estate planning attorney should be able to give you more information regarding the organizations that offer these services.

Pet trusts are becoming more and more popular as a vehicle for providing the funds to care for pets after an owner’s death. If you want to leave money for the care of your pets after you are gone, a pet trust will make sure that the funds are spent on your pet and not used for other purposes.

You also need to consider what happens if you are alive, but unable to care for your pet due to a disability or incapacity. That’s why you should include provisions in your power of attorney allowing your agent to make arrangements for the care of your pet when you’re unable to do so, yourself. Your power of attorney should also allow your agent to expend funds for the care of your pets.

In any event, you should compile a set of instructions for your pet’s caretaker to follow. If your pet needs to be fed a certain type of food at precise times of day, prefers a special toy, has a specific bedtime or needs to be walked three times a day in a specific park near your home, you can include all this information in the instructions.

Many of us consider our pets as are part of our families. As such they need to be included in our estate plan, along with everything else we treasure.

Reference: The Harvard Press (May 14, 2020) “COA speakers urge pet owners to plan for their animal’s future”

 

Continue ReadingEstate Planning for Our Pets

Dividing Personal Items After Death

Many executors wonder how to distribute personal items after a family member's death.
Many executors wonder how to distribute personal items after a family member’s death.

Sometimes, deciding how to divide a family member’s personal items after death can lead to more conflict and bad feelings than dividing up cash and other property.  Many executors wonder how they can do this without causing rifts in the family.

Minneapolis Tribune’s article entitled “A clever way to divvy up items after a parent’s death” describes an unusual plan one family had to divide their mother’s personal property after her death.

According to the article, after their mother’s death at age 93, the co-executors, a brother and a sister, created an inventory of 724 items in her estate that had monetary or sentimental value. These included things like furniture, artwork, oriental rugs, cutlery, china, a piano and a car. They didn’t include their mother’s jewelry, books or linens, or her silver, gold and collectible coins. The four siblings (including the co-executors) all agreed to sell the coins and to deal with the many books, linens,  jewelry, and other items more informally.

The family decided not to follow the usual process of taking turns to choose items they wanted. With so many items, that could take a while. Instead, the co-executors gave each sibling an inventory of their mother’s personal property, with the request that each sibling indicate on the inventory the items he or she wanted. This resulted in the 724 items of personal property being divided into three groups: (a) items in which no one had an interest; (b) items in which only one person had an interest; and (c) those desired by two or more siblings. The items in which no one had an interest were sold or given away. The items wanted by only one person went to that person.

The co-executors then distributed to the siblings a list of the items in which more than one of them had expressed an interest. Each sibling was “given” 500 virtual poker chips that he or she could use to bid for the contested items. However, prior to the bidding deadline, the siblings could talk with one another about their intentions and whether they could come to an agreement regarding specific items. Several of the siblings had bid for items in a general category, such as family pictures, bookcases and oriental rugs. They were able to agree among themselves who would receive which items from those general categories, thus preserving their virtual poker chips for what they really wanted.

After the final bids were in, the co-executors announced who won each item, but, to avoid possible conflict or disagreement on values, they did not reveal how much was bid for each item.

Finally, when all the allocations were determined, the co-executors calculated the value of all the items of personal property received by the siblings and readjusted the estate’s cash distributions to ensure that everyone came out in the same place financially. The most valuable items were a 1919 Steinway drawing room grand piano valued at $25,000; a 2005 Toyota Camry valued at $4,500; and some oriental rugs with a total value of $13,975. Those who got the more valuable items had to pay their siblings something for them, with a total of $17,500 trading hands.

Though it was time-consuming, the process avoided the tensions that sometimes result when personal property is distributed. The siblings involved believed their system was fair and even brought them closer together.

One thing to remember is that you don’t have to leave it to your executor to decide how to divide your personal property. You can leave your executor written instructions on how you wish certain items of sentimental value to be distributed. See https://galligan-law.com/how-a-letter-to-your-executor-or-trustee-conveys-your-wishes/

Reference: Minneapolis Tribune (Feb. 25, 2020) “A clever way to divvy up items after a parent’s death” 

Continue ReadingDividing Personal Items After Death